Yesterday, I gave a presentation to a local group, talking about our Desk Top Genealogy Software, The Sub-title was Which is the BEST Genealogy Desk Top software program ? My answer is "It Depends" (to quote a dear Genealogy Speaker and friend, Judy G Russell, The Legal Genealogist. The title of the talk was Why I chose Family Tree Maker.
Of course I have been using it for a long time, since 1996 and Version 3.4 at I recall, and I blog about it, so there must be something about it that makes it different from the others. The biggest reason is the Workspace concept that was introduced in FTM2008, when the program moved from a DOS base program into Windows.
While I have been using the program, I also have been involved with assisting in teaching and learning the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS). I might note, that I have NO Brick Walls because of GPS. Just look at Step 1.
Today, I was reading a Blog Post, Organize Your Family History by Janine Adams. Her recent blog post My "good enough" Research Log caught my attention. Mostly because, in my talk, I mentioned the Research Log that is part of Family Tree Maker and I used that feature as an example of why I think this program sets it apart from other Genealogy Programs. Please read Janine's Blog Post.
My normal data entry, ALL within the People Workspace, Person View, gives my quick access to two important items. The RESEARCH LOG and my ToDo List for the Profile that I am doing dataentry for. I do NO Data Entry in the Tree View, ALL in the Person View.
When entering new information into my database, for a new person or an existing person is the Citation. Absolutely the FIRST thing that I do. Immediately after that is to Enter data into the Research Log. Absolutely the SECOND thing that I do. Once I got into that habit, I can almost tell that I forgot something. Cite my Source, Research Log, then go from there.
WHY ?
The Citation FIRST gets me into the habit of analyzing the information that I am about to enter into my database. It takes the most time to Craft a Citation (ALWAYS using the Source Template Feature), but I really have to Look at and Analyze what I am about to enter into my file.
From that Source Workspace, I click on the Link or Add a Link to the Profile for that Record I am entering into FTM2019. From there, I click on the Note Tab, which has the Research Log, and make a "good enough" Research Log Entry. Basically the DATA and the Record that was the Citation that I crafted. Most of the time, especially when the Record has more than one Person / Profile on that record. Then I will add the Profile's name. Nothing more, nothing less. I do that so that I can look at the FACTS and the Citations on the Fact to get more detail about what the Research Log is all about.
I can see the Facts that have been entered, with the Research Log below. That first entry in the Research Log was a Revolutionary War record. Looking at the Facts, I can see the Citation on the Right, for that Research Log Entry.
You may note that the Research Log is in a Bullet List, with the Date and Record, in Date Order. The Date or order of entry is not important, but I know WHEN I make that entry and can look at the Citation, with a Link to the Record, right there on the screen.
Note, that my "good enough" Research Log is the Positive stuff that I have done. Mostly from Hints. On that same screen, is the Task Tab or ToDo List for that profile.
The Task List or ToDo list tells me right away, what I need to resolve, things I need to do for that person. In this example, there are TWO Tasks that I have completed. I mark my completed Tasks with "RESOLVED" and how I resolved or completed the Task. I still have two items to complete.
I mentioned that I do ALL of my Data Entry from the Person View, so that I have quick access to My Research Log and ToDo List. Many items in the ToDo List / Task List can only be Resolved by a Record, Conflicting Information for example. I mark, in the ToDo List Conflicting Information.
Bottom line, for the Research Log, I can easily see what I have done, in the order which I did it. I know where to look to see what information I found on that Records, have a mouse click away from that record, all from that screen in Family Tree Maker.
For my "good enough research log" works for me.
Thanks Janine for your Blog Post
___________________________________________________________
Copyright © 2020 by Cousin Russ
Thanks for the mention of my blog post, Cousin Russ. I enjoyed reading how you use the research log in FTM and I linked to this post in comments on mine.
ReplyDeleteJanine,
DeleteThank you.
The timing of your Blog post was perfect. I had wanted to blog about the Research Log feature and your blog post was what I needed to do this post.
Thank you,
Russ
Hello Russ,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this blog and always learn something new. Could you explain more about your settings for the PERSON/NOTES tab and how you prevent your research log from appearing in the Ahnentafel report? When I started using FTM, I entered details from records in the NOTES box, but I am now putting my new data details into the FACT/NOTES tab. So my tree has names using both types of entries. When I run the Ahnentafel report, it pulls the information only from the PERSON/NOTES screen unless I have added FACTS the report 'Items to include' screen.
AnitaB,
DeleteI'll do a blog post on that.
The answer is those "Research Notes" that are in reports are in the Person Notes and NOT the Research Log. Both are in the Notes Tab, but the Person Notes are the First ICON and the Research Log is the 2nd ICON on the Notes Tab.
Russ
Always enjoy your blogs and learn so much from them. I'm curious how you handle "negative" results in your Research Log. Do you craft the Citation and then not include any links?
ReplyDeleteUnknown,
DeleteWhat are "Negative Results" to you.
Two examples:
1) I have a Civil War Registration entry for a profile. The Question Is: Did he SERVE in the Civil War? I can find NO other Civil War Records for this person. At First, I thought that was Negative Results. It isn't. It's Negative Research. Haven't found a record that he served. The Registration certainly does not say he served
2) A missing "adult" Child Not in the household, in a specific Census year. Negative "Results" ? No, at least in my opinion.
Both of these "negative" things to in my ToDo List
1) Did he Serve in the Civil War ?
2) Find this profile in the YYYY Census ?
See page 25, section 1.14 of EvidenceExplained Third Edition, 2015